Reality Hunger Post, 1 of (Probably) 5

I’m reading David Shields’ Reality Hunger. I have many thoughts percolating about the book, but I’d like to wait a bit to synthesize my ideas before writing at length. So instead I’ll to mention one angle: if a nonfiction book acts performatively regarding its thesis that old modes of nonfiction are inadequate, how does one review the book? If you dislike the work, then a “traditional” review works fine – your form is its own refutation. But if you like the book?

Anyways, here are a few links to dive into the conversation. I greatly enjoyed Shields’ event at McNally Jackson last week, and have felt deeply engaged by the book’s arguments thus far.

HTML Giant “Excited, but not to a grave-dancing degree”

New York Magazine “Boundary Issues”

The Rumpus “Reality Boredom: Why David Shields Is Completely Right and Totally Wrong”

And the NYT‘s Michiko Kakutani uses the book as a jumping-off point for her meditation on online reading and writing “Texts Without Context” (A curious case where the article’s form seems to agree with Shields and yet its content is very antithetical).

p.s. I think it would be hilarious if the movie rights were optioned for a big-budget sci-fi movie.

add to : add to furl : Digg it : Stumble It! : seed the vine : : : TailRank : post to facebook


Leave a comment

Filed under reading

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s